Akosombo Dam Spillage: Committee uncovers 15 major lapses in disaster response

A five-member committee appointed by President John Dramani Mahama has submitted a report on the 2023 Akosombo Dam spillage. The report highlights failures in disaster preparedness. It calls for urgent policy reforms to prevent future crises.

The committee presented its findings on May 7, 2025. It noted significant shortcomings in flood mitigation planning and coordination. The Volta River Authority (VRA) conducted controlled spillage from the Akosombo and Kpong dams from September 15 to October 30, 2023. This was due to dangerously high water levels threatening the dams' integrity.

While necessary, the spillage caused severe flooding along the Volta River. An estimated 38,624 people were displaced from their homes. Affected towns included Mepe, Battor, Sogakope Mafi, Adidome, Kpong, and Ada. Victims lost homes, livelihoods, and access to basic services.

The National Disaster Management Organisation (NADMO) and VRA coordinated emergency responses. The government distributed relief items to affected areas. However, the scale of devastation highlighted the need for a stronger national disaster strategy.

In a national address marking his first 120 days in office, President Mahama acknowledged ongoing hardships. He confirmed that compensation for victims is in progress with initial payments expected soon. The government plans to release an action plan based on the committee’s recommendations.

The report outlines key findings regarding the spillage:

1. Water spillage factors include reservoir elevation and rainfall.
2. On September 18, 2023, maximum inflow reached 477,984 cubic feet per second.
3. The total volume discharged during the spill was about 8 Million Acre Feet over 46 days.
4. Historical data shows past spills were much larger than in 2023.
5. Spillage aimed to prevent dam destruction due to high water levels.
6. VRA’s Emergency Preparedness Plan defines roles for all stakeholders during emergencies.
7. Communication issues hindered effective response efforts among agencies involved.
8. Local disaster preparedness plans were lacking; evacuation resources were inadequate.
9. Community members faced challenges like economic reliance on location and fear of relocation.
10. Some affected individuals remain in tents without privacy or adequate shelter options.