Fallout from the petition to remove CJ: Thaddeus Sory Fires, Godfred Dame Responds – The Battle Line Is Drawn

Thaddeus Sory vs. Godfred Dame: A Legal Dispute

Two prominent lawyers, Thaddeus Sory and former Attorney General Godfred Dame, are in a heated exchange. They are arguing over a petition to remove the Chief Justice from office. Below are their statements from Facebook.

From Thaddeus Sory

Sory begins with a direct message. He criticizes Dame, calling him "Mr. Incongruous Cry Baby." He claims that each time Dame ignores lessons, he needs a harder lesson.

Sory accuses Dame of lacking shame. He says that after being quiet for some time, Dame has started making loud claims again on Joy FM’s Top Story program.

Dame alleged that the NDC government politicized the removal process. He pointed out lawyers representing the petitioners, including Sory and Tsatsu Tsikata.

Sory responds by questioning who represents the suspended Chief Justice. He notes that Dame himself appeared in two of four suits related to this case.

Sory reminds Dame of his past appointments under President Nana Akufo-Addo. He highlights how many NPP lawyers supported him during Supreme Court proceedings.

He argues that it is hypocritical for Dame to claim he represents clients based solely on political affiliation. Sory emphasizes his diverse legal history beyond party lines.

He mentions his work with various clients across different political backgrounds. This includes defending individuals in high-profile cases unrelated to the NDC.

Sory insists he is bound by legal ethics to represent anyone who hires him. He expresses sympathy for those who view everything through an NDC lens.

He challenges Dame's claim of standing up for judicial independence as insincere self-preservation. Sory recalls how Dame benefited from controversial Supreme Court decisions during his tenure.

He states he defended the judiciary publicly despite personal involvement in related matters.

Sory questions how someone can defend questionable judicial actions while claiming righteousness.

He points out several unethical practices attributed to Dame as Attorney-General, such as improper communication with accused persons and filing inappropriate injunctions.

In closing, Sory warns that further criticism may not be gentle but severe.

From Godfred Yeboah Dame

Dame responds by criticizing Sory's language and behavior as unprofessional. He suggests that Sory's comments reflect poorly on his standing at the Bar.

Dame claims he has ignored previous attacks but feels compelled to correct inaccuracies now. He dismisses allegations about never losing a case as falsehoods spread by NDC supporters.

Dame asserts he has acknowledged losses during his tenure as Attorney-General to highlight judicial independence in Ghana.

He cites specific cases where adverse decisions were made against his office, emphasizing respect for judicial outcomes regardless of personal views.

Dame recalls instances where he publicly discussed significant losses at Bar Conferences to demonstrate judicial strength and independence.

He challenges Sory’s assertion about improved legal acumen since becoming Attorney-General, referencing past court victories against him when they were opposing counsel.

Dame urges caution against boasting about legal skills without acknowledging failures or losses experienced along the way.

He reminds readers of successful international arbitration cases led during his tenure without foreign counsel assistance.

Finally, he addresses accusations regarding political affiliations among lawyers involved in this case and defends his duty to represent any client fairly.

From Thaddeus Sory Again

Sory thanks friends and family for their support but feels compelled to respond again due to ongoing provocations from Dame.

He accuses Dame of hypocrisy regarding claims of obsession while frequently mentioning him publicly.

Sory highlights inconsistencies in Dame’s arguments about representation based on political affiliation versus actual client relationships.

He critiques how often they have clashed over legal principles and courtroom conduct while maintaining professionalism throughout their exchanges.

In conclusion, Sory expresses regret over needing to engage further but feels it necessary given ongoing public remarks from Dame.