GBA warns against political interference in Chief Justice removal

The Ghana Bar Association (GBA) has called for strict adherence to the law. This comes amid the ongoing process to potentially remove the Chief Justice of Ghana. The Chief Justice was recently suspended.

On April 24, 2025, GBA President Ku Gyau Baffour and National Secretary issued a statement. They noted that the association has been monitoring developments for two months.

During a meeting on March 27, 2025, the General Council of the GBA reviewed the situation. As of that date, three petitions had been submitted for the Chief Justice's removal. Additionally, two legal suits were filed at the Supreme Court challenging these procedures.

The statement confirmed that injunction applications were also submitted as part of those cases. The GBA emphasized its duty to defend freedom and justice. It aims to protect judicial independence.

The GBA referenced Articles 146(6) to 146(10) of the 1992 Constitution. These articles outline how to remove a Chief Justice. A five-member committee must be formed for this purpose.

Two members must be Supreme Court judges and three civilians not linked to Parliament or legal professions. The President appoints this committee in consultation with the Council of State.

Under Article 146(8) to (10), committee meetings must be held in camera. The President can suspend the Chief Justice pending inquiry results based on advice from the Council of State.

While recognizing this framework, the GBA hopes all parties will follow rule-of-law principles and justice spirit. They reminded stakeholders about Article 296 regarding discretionary powers.

All actions should uphold judicial independence and public trust in it. The statement reiterated GBA’s commitment to defending justice delivery systems.

The association acts as society's conscience and gives voice to the voiceless. It affirmed its role in upholding Ghana’s Constitution and boosting confidence in legal institutions.

“The GBA shall remain society's conscience,” concluded their statement, “and act to safeguard Rule of Law.”