Mahama did no wrong—lawyer backs CJ suspension process

Constitutional lawyer Raymond Bidema has responded to claims against President John Mahama. Critics allege he violated procedures in suspending Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaaba Sackey Torkornoo.

In an interview with Tutuwaa Danso on Starr Today, Mr. Bidema addressed these criticisms. The Minority in Parliament argues that the President bypassed legal provisions, especially Article 296 of the 1992 Constitution.

Mr. Bidema stated, “The Constitution clearly outlines how this matter should be handled.” He explained that when there is a petition against the Chief Justice, the President must consult the Council of State. This consultation helps determine if a prima facie case exists.

Once established, it is up to the President to decide on suspension. Mr. Bidema emphasized that President Mahama acted according to Article 146(6). This article details the proper steps for handling petitions against a sitting Chief Justice.

He believes the Minority’s interpretation ignores the clear mandate given to the President under this article.

Meanwhile, Henry Nana Boakye, National Organizer for the New Patriotic Party (NPP), hinted at a large demonstration over the Chief Justice's suspension. He views this decision as politically motivated and harmful to democracy.

In a social media post, he criticized the President for making such a decision. He claimed it fulfills a pledge made before the 2024 elections.

Boakye urged people to protest against what he called “Mahama’s evil agenda against the judiciary.” He believes these actions are part of a political promise made by NDC prior to elections.