Thaddeus Sory fires back at Dame, dismisses ‘obsession’ claim

Legal practitioner Thaddeus Sory has responded to former Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame. He rejected claims that his criticisms are based on jealousy.

In a social media post titled “AND STILL CRYING INCONGRUOUSLY – PART ONE,” Sory criticized Dame's professional inconsistencies. He accused Dame of disguising political rhetoric as legal analysis. This exchange follows Dame’s rebuttal to Sory’s critiques, where he called Sory obsessed and envious.

Sory dismissed these claims, stating his comments are based on principle, not personal feelings. He argued that Dame's response did not address the issues raised but instead attacked his character. This back-and-forth highlights tensions in Ghana’s legal and political spheres.

Sory expressed gratitude for advice from friends and family in his post. He mentioned two reasons for speaking out: hope for change and a refusal to tolerate spoiled behavior.

He summarized Dame's previous response, noting accusations of obsession and unethical criticism. Sory pointed out that the judiciary has shown independence despite polls suggesting otherwise.

Sory questioned whether Dame truly wrote the response himself. He highlighted contradictions in Dame's statements about clients and cases he represented.

He recalled instances where Dame publicly criticized him while forgetting his own past actions. Sory noted how often he is mentioned by Dame in interviews, suggesting an obsession.

He emphasized that every comment he made was a reaction to Dame’s media mentions of him. Sory stated it is absurd to claim he is obsessed with someone he taught in court last year.

He referenced a judicial correction received by Dame regarding basic legal principles. Sory also pointed out flaws in a case against Jakpa that involved both of them.

Dame claimed the Supreme Court would have overturned a decision if not for an appeal withdrawal, which Sory disputed as incompetent.

Sory criticized the use of public platforms by lawyers to discuss ongoing cases, citing ethical rules against it. He questioned why there have been no sanctions against such behavior.

He described Dame's response as self-adulation and suggested it reflects delusion rather than reality.

In closing, Sory apologized for having to make this statement but felt compelled to respond appropriately.