Torkornoo is not being denied a fair trial -AG

Chief Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo is facing a legal challenge. Ghana’s Attorney-General, Dr. Dominic Akuritinga Ayine, opposes her motion for an injunction. This motion relates to her removal process from office.

The case is under Supreme Court Suit No. J8/113/2025. It has attracted national attention, involving key government branches. The Chief Justice wants to stop the inquiry committee set up by the President. She argues that this process violates her constitutional rights and harms judicial independence.

Dr. Ayine is the first respondent in this case. He filed an affidavit opposing the Chief Justice's claims through State Attorney Reginald Nii Odoi. He denied all allegations made by the Chief Justice and called her motion meritless.

In his affidavit, Dr. Ayine rejected claims of bias and procedural issues. He emphasized that in-camera hearings are necessary to protect judicial dignity and witnesses' safety. He stated, “The Applicant cannot waive constitutional safeguards meant for the judiciary.”

Dr. Ayine also dismissed accusations about government leaks regarding the removal process. He suggested that any dissatisfaction with official records should not justify an injunction request.

He referenced a Supreme Court ruling from May 21, 2025, supporting his stance against granting an injunction based on similar claims.

In response, Justice Torkornoo described the inquiry as a “mockery of justice.” She alleged psychological harassment during hearings at Castle Osu, which she deemed inappropriate for such proceedings.

She reported invasive body searches and restrictions on communication tools for her legal team. Family members were also excluded from attending these hearings.

Justice Torkornoo claimed these actions amounted to degrading treatment not seen even with treason suspects. She criticized the committee for not recognizing her legal counsel during earlier sessions.

The Chief Justice has asked the Supreme Court to intervene and halt proceedings to protect her position and judicial integrity.

However, Dr. Ayine insists that all actions taken by the President and inquiry committee are constitutionally valid and should continue.

The Supreme Court will soon set a date to hear this injunction motion. Legal analysts view this case as crucial for Ghana’s democracy and judicial independence.