Minority Condemns Kumasi Mayor’s Threats To Traders

The Minority Caucus on Parliament’s Local Government and Rural Development Committee has condemned remarks made by Mr. Richard Ofori Agyemang Boadi. He is the Metropolitan Chief Executive (MCE) of the Kumasi Metropolitan Assembly (KMA). The Caucus described his comments as “reckless” and “undemocratic.”

During a decongestion exercise in Kumasi, Mr. Boadi suggested a "military-democratic" enforcement style. He also threatened physical action against traders who do not follow Assembly directives. His statements have sparked backlash, particularly from the Minority.

They argue that such rhetoric undermines Ghana’s democratic principles. In a statement signed by Francis Asenso-Boakye, they acknowledged MMDAs' legal authority under the Local Governance Act (Act 936). However, they emphasized that this power must respect citizens' rights.

“Violence and threats of abuse are unacceptable in our democracy,” the statement said. The Caucus warned that Mr. Boadi’s comments could harm public trust in local government institutions. They also noted it could lead to potential human rights violations.

The Minority urged the Minister for Local Government to intervene quickly. They want him to advise Mr. Boadi to retract his statements and adopt a more humane approach. They called on KMA to engage with affected traders and find inclusive solutions.

This includes providing alternative trading spaces for them. “Decongestion must not come at the cost of livelihoods,” they emphasized. Traders are not adversaries; they contribute to the local economy under difficult conditions.

The Minority reaffirmed their commitment to accountable local governance. They believe clean cities should be pursued through law, compassion, education, and collaboration—not fear or threats.

“We must build a country governed by law and respect for all Ghanaians,” they concluded. This controversy has reignited debate over local authorities' methods during urban decongestion drives. Civil society is also calling for restraint and rights-based approaches.