The law is not the bar’s exclusive domain – Thaddeus Sory fires back at GBA

Thaddeus Sory, a well-known lawyer, has criticized the Ghana Bar Association (GBA). He disagrees with their reaction to the Chief Justice's suspension. Sory believes that law is not solely for the Bar to interpret.

His comments followed the GBA’s outrage over the suspension. The GBA also called for the Acting Chief Justice to change case assignments.

In a Facebook post on April 29, 2025, Sory condemned the GBA’s demands. He described them as legally flawed and inconsistent.

Sory argued that the GBA's call to revoke the suspension was misguided. He stated that it overlooked the powers of the Chief Justice's office. These powers matter more than who holds the title.

He pointed out that suggesting these powers were personal is legally inaccurate. Under constitutional law, he noted, the acting Chief Justice has full authority. This authority comes from the office, not individual discretion.

Regarding the legality of the suspension, Sory reminded GBA about Article 146(10) of the 1992 Constitution. This article states that only after advice from the Council of State can a President suspend a Chief Justice. He emphasized this is a constitutional obligation; unilateral action is not allowed.

“The law is not just for Bar interpretation,” Sory said. He added that their stance contradicts their previous silence on past violations by the suspended Chief Justice.

Sory also recalled how previous attempts by GBA to challenge constitutional matters ended in defeats.

He urged GBA to take its grievances to court if they believe in their case. “If you have a solid case, avoid public outbursts or threats,” he advised.

Sory’s response has reignited debate over the legality of suspending the Chief Justice and Bar's role in interpreting law. The GBA now faces pressure to either pursue legal action or withdraw its opposition publicly.

The legal community remains divided on this issue as discussions continue.